Sunday, 13 May 2018

Evaluation

Over this year in PPP the most vital development I made a designer was at my work placement. This was as it gave me a realistic view of artworking, defining what I don’t want to do in the future. The placement was overall good, but some days I spend 9 hours cutting out images or moving text which I hated. This defined me as a creative, as well as an advertiser. Over the next few week/months, I aim to get an advertising placement due to the amount I learn about professional working environments at Little. I feel now it’s vital to do placement before starting a job, as it gives a view of the job as well as showed me what I’m missing as a designer.

In PPP for the last few years I’ve experimented with a range of different personal branding and styles, this year I’ve tried to perfect this to currently representing me. I’m very aware this will change in the future, as I change, but currently, this fits my design style and my personal aims. The branding was inspired by a range of personalised sharpies I created. These outcomes were vastly more popular with my peer, tutor and professional than expected due to the accuracy of the design. I’m aware these had a massive impact on my success of getting offered 2 work placement, as when I got my placement it was mention. These then inspired my other branding, to fit with the colour in the idea. The final branding is engaging yet also reflects me and my practice. The tone maybe be slightly more playful than some designer branding, this is as personally I am aiming to be more playful and creative.

My branding covers a range of channels I felt suitable for myself. I didn't include a CV as currently, I feel my promo pack and ideas reflect my skills better than my previous experience. I aim to appeal to clients or studios via my style, standing out due to creativity so felt the promo pack and portfolio showed this in the most appropriate manner.

Over the year I’ve developed my client communication skills over my design skills. This was present in my Extend Practise, as I tried to focus on Live Brief as these are more accurate to future briefs I will be set. The year was a massive learning curve, that enough design is important.

PPP 3 - Fine Art Logo, Final Evaluation


This brief had a range of weakness and issues, but overall these were then learnt from in my other brief and informed major issues in my practice that I can work on to fix. This was due to the communication issues with the client. The brief was for a logo design originally, which I won and then a set of posters/social content were also needed. This is a was thought to be about 3/4 weeks work, a week for each aspect. In the end, the brief took over 4 months to work out the final poster design. This was not constant work for 4 months but was draining and hard to get feedback, often thought to be finished only to then be changed again. The client was Jenny Beard, a fine art representative, and I was under the impression that it was her choice on the poster design. It turns out that the whole course of over 70 students with greatly different style had to decide on one poster together.

This is borderline was impossible, as some of the students also took out personal issues with Jenny on the brief, and regretted concepts due to trying to make her life harder. They also refused often to give constructive feedback, but just complain. There were polls set up on estudio and feedback boxes made, idea but no one reacted to these. The course also supplied the fee, these means they wanted more control over the design as they were paying for it themselves, which causes more complaints. Due to all these issues, 5 set of poster design was created, before the final idea selected. This has informed my practice as now when set a brief, the client will be defined more, a set of design stages organized before more payment is needed, and also how many people will have to approve the design will be decided. I really happy with the 4th set of design for the brief, so was Jenny and others and feel these would have been a better final outcome.  Next, with a client, I will be more forceful when setting the final designs.

Another aspect of my practice this defined was the need for in-person meetings. During the 5th stages I was very annoyed with the brief and the client, due to this a meeting was organised with Jenny in person for the first time, rather than over facebook. This meeting was a turning point in the brief, as it allowed me to understand the issue with the course more. To realise the issue Jenny was facing to, and how we had to resolve this. It also was easier to define the set changes and explain these in person, in general, gave more clear insight into the brief. This should be done more with future briefs.

This briefs strength focused on the amount of development of my practice. I’ve learnt largely for the issues and this informed Olivia Marshalls and Meanwood farm brief, as I made sure the meeting focused on being in person and setting a list of outcomes at the start. I also do really like the 4th opinion I created and will use this in my portfolio as this is a big brief and client. This brief also allowed me to connect more with a different course at uni, creating connections with future artists I might work with. The design pushed me outside of my comfort zone, as it had to concentrate on visual design rather than conceptual advertising I prefer, but this showed I do like this and can do this style of design.

Tuesday, 8 May 2018

PPP3 - Mock ups

Mock ups 

One of the main things i was told when i visited This Creative in Manchester was to make sure that my mock ups use the correct surroundings. To make sure that when i produce outcome in placement for the client that they are realistic, so the client can be how they will work best. For my live projects this year i've tried to make sure that this is done, as i've applied this to my outcomes.

This give a more professional feel to my work, whilst also make sure they client can be a realistic view of the outcome making it easier for them to understand the outcome. 



for peter and paul -




 for meanwood farm-




Monday, 7 May 2018

Petting Zoo Brief, Collab, Final Evaluation


This brief was one of my personal favourite, this is due to the strength of the collaboration. At the start of the brief, we defined what each of us would go along with a list of outcomea, (due to fine art issue). These were delegated based on specialist areas and this worked really well to enhance the final design. We both worked on the different areas and didn’t need to redo or change anything, as it was done to a successful level. This meant that we managed to create more outcomes in the shorter time. A full rebrand was completed, but this was relatively easy compared to the workload, done as it was split in half. In past collaboration, I've had to pester, or do work the other partner was supposed to do to fit deadline but Nanami and I worked well together so this was not needed.  Playing to our different strength was successful, in future, we could work together again and defined what I need to look for in collaborations. Another aspect learnt for Fine art was to meet in person, this was a defining aspect of the effective nature of the brief as we explained our idea better and communicated more productively.
 
I feel the visual of the outcome are the main strengths, the outcome is fit for the different audience whilst fulling the set issue. Visiting the client area also allowed for the issues to be pinpointed in more elaborated ways, this showed the map didn’t work and also the lack of consistent style, which were fixed by the final outcome. In general, the outcome covers all the needed area and fixes all the issue we encountered and set in the brief. The work was equally set, meaning we both had a large input to the final outcome.

The only weakness of the brief was the with the printing of the final sticker, and the financial issue with the production of stamps. We did want to make stamps children could interact with on the map, but could not support this idea without funding from the client. There were issues with the final print of the sticker, even booked in advance of the deadline the sticker could not be printed correctly due to the illness of the technician. Again if this was funded they could have been professionally printed.

The time planning of this brief was morphe slightly to work around both partner other deadlines but each partner was understanding of this and the final outcome was produced on time.

Adobe Illustrator was used for the design of the outcomes, this software gave large design control. Both collaborators had access and knowledge of the software, meaning we could work on one document keeping the style and guidelines consistent applied over the media. A shared google drive was created at the start of the brief, this was heavily used so both partners had access to full high-quality files alongside the other work.

The final outcomes connect all the client current inconsistent branding as well as fix their outdated and no longer fit for purpose design style. All the assets where re-designed, and the two set of poster sell the client to young adults/teenagers by creating a new, more modern design whilst the family poster allows the brand to still appeal to the current audience of children and families. The social media was added to all their assets to promote this advertising channel, as well as the sites updated for their audience and to match. The outcome covers the set media, advertising and branding, including the website design, social media and print advertising. A total rebrand was completed, that balances the audience ages via informed research. The brand's aims, tones and style are also reflected via the rustic nature of the design.

Friday, 4 May 2018

PPP3 - building a website for a live client, WIX

Building a website for a live client, WIX

For Mean-wood Farm a collaboration i'm designing the website, to do this as it need to be able to work live i've decided to use a website building site. Allowing them to use the website without having to hire a developer. I've never used this site before, and only need to design a home page.

THIS ALSO MEANS THEY CAN SEE HOW TO WEBSITE WILL WORK/INTERACT WITH IT

 
-NEEDS TO BE CHILD FRIENDLY,
-USE COLOUR SCHEME AND HOUSE STYLE
-USE LOGO AND TYPE

using the colour scheme -


ALLOW CORRECT COLOUR


ALLOWS CORRECT TYPEFACE TO IMPROVE CONSIENCE

EASY TO USE THIS SITE TO SHOW CLIENT HOW WEBSITE WOULD WORK/BE INTERACTIVE WITHOUT A DEVELOPER. USE TO SHOW DESIGN IDEAS, JUST AS EXAMPLE

Work placement position at OTB.

MEETING ORGAINSIED FOR THE 16TH

Thursday, 3 May 2018

P&P LUA Art Work - FINAL EVALUATION

For this brief I got to work on one of my specialist areas, it was a typographical based project. I really like this aspect of the brief, as I got to experiment with more functional, purposeful type work and newer more modern style. I also got to make a connection with a design studio, due to the brief being set by Peter and Paul. This was useful as I got to experience what it’s like working with a professional design studio, and also because if they liked my work or remember me it could lead to future opportunities. Another positive of this brief was that it’s a piece that will be used in the LUA new building, displaying my work to a range of creatives as well as being around for a long time and being able to see my work actually used/made. This will also be a good portfolio piece, as shows my ability to work with a studio and also my type skills.
 
The major issue with this brief is the difference in my personal design preferences and the clients. The overall outcome is not the style I would have picked or want to be used but they are happy with this outcome. This is just due to personal style differences, but I managed to create a piece the client was finally happy with due to mass feedback and informed development. At the start of the brief I developed idea too much and places too much time into a style before asking for feedback, this was an issue as the designs focused on the digital type and the client wanted hand drawn. This massive effective the time planning as I had to redo the brief from the start, but this time I learnt from the past issue and sent over sketches before developing the idea. This is also something I should learn from in the future, design clients can work with sketches as they can visualise the ideas but this is not the same for non-creative clients they need to see outcome/digital version. There was a wide range of changes made by the client, I feel this would have been reduced if the feedback was done in person. A few stages where added as the changes were not communicated or understood fully.

As mentioned time planning for this brief was drawn out, this was due to the changed the client wanted and the total redesign. I expected one of the first designs to be picked, maybe with a few changes but this was not done therefore added an extra week for the new work. The work was completed for the deadline with another set of changes, but again more changes were sent back the day of the deadline at 5 o’clock which meant it had to be extended.  The feedback from the client in this brief took quite a lot of time, this all dragged out the brief as I was waiting days for feedback.

The final design was created by hand then drawn over using illustrator, this is due to the brief specifications so the client could edit the design is needed. Also, this media was used so the final outcome was a vector, keeping it high quality at any size and also easily resizable without pixelation.

The quote ‘Freedom of Speaking Art through Heart’ was not very visible in the final outcome, which personally seems unfunctional. The client specified this is a chance to ‘really let yourself go’ in the brief which implied they were looking for abstract creative pieces outcome does work for this, but not legibility which was also mentioned.  The set sizing and specifications were kept to throughout the brief.